Review From My Queue: Blazing Saddles

Mel Brooks is/was a big deal in comedy right?  And Blazing Saddles is supposed to be one of the best comedies ever made.  So said all of my comedian friends, which is to say people who have taken comedy classes at UCB or Second City, etc.  It also usually places in the “top ten” comedy lists from AFI, Ebert, IMDB or any other place that bothers to list such things.

So having not seen it with all the bona fides was for me both one of the biggest holes in the film canon and made it perhaps the film with the heaviest burden of its own reputation.  Any film that is touted as “one of the greatest ever made” has the viewers’ expectations raised to an almost insurmountable level, but to also call it “funniest” is tantamount to a death warrant.  It is the curse of all “great” works that as the standard-bearers for their form they are always under the most scrutiny -- especially from those who are not yet familiar or sympathetic with the artist, players or story.  Comedy usually works best when it is unexpected, so a movie that has become the definition of funny-movies starts with a very un-funny handicap.

Of course people who know and love Blazing Saddles would probably disqualify me from writing about it now that I’m thirty-one and have a film degree, but that doesn’t stop me from doing it anyway, and I fully acknowledged all of my expectations as I sat down to watch it.

It dawned on me by the third or fourth line of the film, “Dock that c**nk a day’s pay for sleepin’ on the job,” that this was a much more potent comedic film than I had anticipated.  From that point forward the film continued with its surprises, some subtle, most not.  The Count Basie orchestra playing in the middle of the dessert; the infamous baked beans scene; the pie fight in the break room at Warner Brothers studios -- they all go one step further than another until they’re so far off the map that its difficult to say if anyone has really gone “there” since, certainly not in the past ten or fifteen years.

Brooks seems determined to take the low road at every juncture and also determined to subvert any and all conventions of not only the Western Genre but even the most basic of film “rules.”  The anachronistic inclusion of Nazis and motorcycle handlebars on horses, the direct addresses to camera, even the clearly-intentional continuity errors; these all challenge the accepted format and syntax to which 90% of Hollywood movies conform.  While this is hardly unique in Brooks’ body of work, these devices keep the audience on their toes and reminds them that they are in on the joke that the characters in the film never seem to be aware of.

But was it funny?  Oddly enough, I can’t recall laughing out loud once during the entire film, but while writing this I find myself smirking at all the absurdity.  In fact I think that’s why you should push this film to at least number #4 or #7 on your Netflix queue.  Besides being a side-splitting movie (which it wasn’t for me), Blazing Saddles has the balls to reach for the most absurd and in doing so it achieves a singular place in “the canon.”  This is a filmic Myth Of Sisyphus because it in all the chaos and absurdity, the film’s critiques of racism and the bogus mythology of The Old West are able to transcend the farts and schticky-fake-accents to a timeless-poignancy and simultaneously defeat the despair you would expect from such madness.  As Brooks himself put it, “it rises below vulgarity.”

 


How to Sound Smart this Week (05/16)

How to Sound Smart this Week is your weekly cheat sheet for hobnobbing at cocktail parties and shmoozing with your boss.  Every Monday we will preview the stories that will be making the headlines over the coming days and break them down for you so that you can, well, sound smart this week.

 

Atchafalaya River


  • What it is: a river in South Central Louisianna that is formed at the confluence (meeting place) of the Mississippi River and the Red River. The flow of the Atchafalaya is controlled by the Old River Control Structure, a series of spillways and dams that dictate the amount of water the Atchafalaya receives. Generally, the Atchafalaya receives about 30 percent of the water of the lower Mississippi River.  However, without the Old River Control Structure, a majority of the water of the Mississippi would flow into the Atchafalaya, bypassing Baton Rouge and New Orleans.
  • Why it's important now: For only the second time in history, four gates of the Morganza Spillway, which controls the flow of the Mississippi River into the Atchafalaya, were opened on Saturday, sending 10,000 cubic feet of Mississippi River water into the Atchafalaya River, in attempt to relieve pressure on the levees of Baton Rouge and New Orleans.  Over the course of approximately threedays, water will flood the Atchafalaya until hitting it's southern point, near Morgan City, Louisianna.  At that point the water will "back up" through the Atchafalaya Basin, causing major flooding in bayou towns and requiring the evacuation of up to 25,000 people.
  • Random Fact: the name "Atchafalaya" comes from the Choctaw term for "long river" -  hacha, for "river," and falaia, for "long."

Dominique Strauss-Kahn

  • Who he is:  Managing Director of the International Monetary Fund; potential Socialist Party candidate for president of France.
  • Why he's important now: He was arrested Friday on a plane from JKF to Paris, minutes before takeoff, on charges of attempted rape and unlawful imprisonment.  According to allegations by a housekeeper at the Sofitel Hotel in New York, while she was cleaning in the foyer of Strauss-Kahn's suite, he emerged naked out of the bathroom, pulled her onto the bed, and, after she fought him off, dragged her down the hallway into the bathroom and forced her to perform oral sex on him. The housekeeper reported the incident to hotel personnel, who called 911. By the time the police arrived, Strauss-Kahn had left, apparently in a hurry, having left behind his cell phone. 
  • Random Fact: Last week, Strauss-Kahn was criticized as a "champagne socialist" after he was photographed getting into a Porsche Panamera, which sells for approximately $140,000.
The Idolmaker
  • What it is: a 1980 biopic of famed music scout Bob Marcucci, originally directed by Taylor Hackford, whose directorial credits also include An Officer and a Gentleman, Ray, and his true contribution to American filmmaking, The Devil's Advocate
  • Why it's important now: it was reported this weekend that  Ryan Gosling will direct and star in the remake of the film.  If you are still wondering why this is important now, I repeat: Ryan Gosling will direct and star in the remake of the film.
  • Random Fact: I saw Ryan Gosling in a coffee shop in my neighborhood on Friday morning. No, I will not specify the coffee shop. He's mine, bitches.

 

 

Vox Critica: An Introduction

“Vox Critica” is a completely made up phrase that, according to our sixth grade Latin, means “the critical voice,” though we’ve also been told that there may be some singular-plural disagreement. We’re fine with it, especially considering all the gmail chat-based brainstorming that it took to settle on something we liked that also had an available URL. It’s hard naming things these days, the internet is a pretty crowded place.

Vox Critica is a site for wide-ranging first person journalism about the things that we come into contact with all the time, specifically the arts, culture and daily life in the big city. We’re very open in our ethos and hope that something wouldn’t be right for site only if it is a poorly thought out bit of dreck that only just skims the surface. And because we surround ourselves with smart, funny, interesting people that’s yet to be the case.

The site was born out of the our desire to have a creative outlet where the challenging conversations and sometimes heated discussions that all too often are held over a bottle of wine and are quickly forgotten could live forever. We tried to build a site that covers not only the topics of the day with a critical eye but also the things that we do everyday. We’re not interested in rants, it’s not particularly interesting to read another random person’s take on how the New York City subway system wears down the soul. Instead, we’re interested in the why of it all, the reasons and rationales behind both why things are great and why they are terrible. We firmly believe in taking a close look at things and that opinions need to be backed up with facts; we aren’t as interested in reviewing something so much as analyzing it in a critical fashion. Because the way we look at things defines us, as a group, as much as any action we may take, which lead us to the motto, with a tip of the hat to Marshall McLuhan, “the critic is the culture.”

Thanks for stopping by, have a look around and hopefully you’ll find something that interests you. We appreciate your time.

 

 

“Vox Critica” is a completely made up phrase that, according to our sixth grade Latin, means “the critical voice,” though we’ve also been told that there may be some singular-plural disagreement. We’re fine with it, especially considering all the gmail chat-based brainstorming that it took to settle on something we liked that also had an available URL. It’s hard naming things these days, the internet is a pretty crowded place.

Vox Critica is a site for wide-ranging first person journalism about the things that we come into contact with all the time, specifically the arts, culture and daily life in the big city. We’re very open in our ethos and hope that something wouldn’t be right for site only if it is a poorly thought out bit of dreck that only just skims the surface. And because we surround ourselves with smart, funny, interesting people that’s yet to be the case.

The site was born out of the our desire to have a creative outlet where the challenging conversations and sometimes heated discussions that all too often are held over a bottle of wine and are quickly forgotten could live forever. We tried to build a site that covers not only the topics of the day with a critical eye but also the things that we do everyday. We’re not interested in rants, it’s not particularly interesting to read another random person’s take on how the New York City subway system wears down the soul. Instead, we’re interested in the why of it all, the reasons and rationales behind both why things are great and why they are terrible. We firmly believe in taking a close look at things and that opinions need to be backed up with facts; we aren’t as interested in reviewing something so much as analyzing it in a critical fashion. Because the way we look at things defines us, as a group, as much as any action we may take, which lead us to the motto, with a tip of the hat to Marshall McLuhan, “the critic is the culture.”

Thanks for stopping by, have a look around and hopefully you’ll find something that interests you. We appreciate your time.